Tag: herbicide

Missouri Legislature approves House Bill to toughen penalties for illegal herbicide use

The legislature has passed a House bill that would toughen penalties for those who illegally apply herbicides.

Representative Don Rone says hundreds of farmers in the Bootheel suffered damage due to illegal herbicide use. (photo; Tim Bommel, Missouri House Communications)
Representative Don Rone says hundreds of farmers in the Bootheel suffered damage due to illegal herbicide use. (photo; Tim Bommel, Missouri House Communications)

House Bill 662, sponsored by Portageville Republican Don Rone, was filed in response to incidents last year in which farmers applied the product dicamba, resulting in damage to neighboring farmers’ crops that used seeds not resistant to that herbicide.  With Thursday’s vote, the bill goes to Governor Eric Greitens (R) for his consideration.

Under the bill if the Department of Agriculture finds someone has used a particular herbicide on a crop for which its manufacturer did not intend its use, the Department can fine that person up to $10,000.  If that person violates the bill’s provisions twice in three years, the fine can be up to $25,000.

The House had proposed fines up to up $1,000 per acre on which the herbicide had been applied and up to $2,000 per acre for what the bill terms “chronic violators.”  The Senate changed those fines and the legislature adopted the Senate’s version.

Rone explained the Senate’s proposal could actually be tougher on a violator.

“When you put that into a per-violation, it will become a larger penalty than we had at $1,000 an acre,” said Rone.  “What I mean by that is if you look at this document that I just received at our local distributor, there’s 11 items on here that you have to do to use the compound of dicamba.  Each one of those, if you don’t do that, is a violation.  So this, if you didn’t  do any of these things that the label requires you to do, that’s $110,000 for a field, so they really did increase the ability to fine someone for the illegal use of it.”

Rone said farmers whose crops are damaged by improper herbicide application could still go to court to seek civil penalties against those responsible.

After the House agreed with the senate and approved House Bill 662, House Speaker Todd Richardson signs it so it can be sent to Governor Eric Greitens for his consideration. (photo; Tim Bommel, Missouri House Communications)
After the House agreed with the senate and approved House Bill 662, House Speaker Todd Richardson signs it so it can be sent to Governor Eric Greitens for his consideration. (photo; Tim Bommel, Missouri House Communications)

The bill includes an emergency clause, which means it would become effective immediately upon being signed by Governor Greitens.  Normally legislation goes into effect on August 28 unless otherwise specified.

St. Louis Democrat Tracy McCreery said that emergency clause is important.

“It’s because we’re dealing with planting seasons and growing seasons and that kind of thing, so this absolutely, for it to have any teeth, has to go into effect before August 28 or we will have missed our window of time to make a difference,” said McCreery.

The bill also gives the Department additional powers to investigate claims of illegal uses.  Farmers penalized for illegal uses would be liable to the Department for its expenses and for personal property affected.

Fines collected under HB 662 would go to the school district local to the effected farms.

A University of Missouri Extension plant sciences expert told lawmakers 150 or more farmers last year lost an average of 35-percent of the crops when wind and temperature changes caused illegally applied herbicide to spread onto nearby fields.

Though such improper use of herbicides is illegal, Rone said many farmers would still do it if it offered them an advantage because current fines are not enough of a deterrent.

The House voted to pass HB 662, 143-12.  Governor Greitens could sign the bill into law, veto it, or allow it to become law without taking action on it.  Rone and other legislators are hopeful he will sign it into law in time for farmers to begin work toward planting season.

Earlier stories:

Missouri House proposes bigger fines for illegally applying herbicides, after Bootheel farmers’ losses

House asked to consider tougher penalties for illegal herbicide use that cost farmers crops

House asked to consider tougher penalties for illegal herbicide use that cost farmers crops

The House is considering a bill meant to stop illegal herbicide use that in 2016 cost 150 or more farmers part of their crops.

Representative Don Rone (photo; Tim Bommel, Missouri House Communications)
Representative Don Rone (photo; Tim Bommel, Missouri House Communications)

Kevin Bradley with the University of Missouri told the House Committee on Agriculture Policy those farmers lost an average of 35-percent of their crops, when neighboring farmers used an outdated dicamba product.  Wind and temperature changes caused that product to spread onto nearby fields.  Because the product was drifting onto fields not planted with seeds resistant to it, those crops were damaged.

Bradley said some farmers did not want to answer its questions, so more than 150 might have been impacted.

Portageville Republican Don Rone has sponsored House Bill 662, which would fine a farmer a civil penalty of $1,000 for every acre on which a product is spread illegally.  The current fine is a flat $1,000, which Rone says is not enough.

“I think $1,000 an acre is a substantial deterrent to a grower to misuse a compound,” Rone told the committee.

That per-acre fine would be doubled for farmers who repeatedly violate the new law.  The money collected in fines would go to the local school district.

The bill would also give the Department of Agriculture additional powers to investigate claims of illegal uses.  Farmers penalized for illegal use would be liable to the Department for its expenses and for personal property affected.

It would also require the makers of dicamba or other volatile compounds to train those using them, and require those wishing to use them to complete that training before they can buy it.

Farmers who sustain losses would not receive compensation under the bill, and would still have to seek it by taking those responsible to court.

Rone’s bill includes an emergency clause, which would make it effective immediately upon being signed by the governor.  He said without that, the law would take effect in August; that’s too late to impact the 2017 planting season.

He wants to see it become law before legislators go on their spring break next month.

“If we can’t make this cross the finish line before break, there’s no use of even … it’s not going to affect much because it’s not going to have any bearing on what they can do and what they can’t do,” Rone said.

HB 662 has the support of the Missouri Soybean Association, the Missouri Corn Growers Association, and the Missouri Farm Bureau.  No one testified against it in the hearing.

The committee is anticipated to vote on Rone’s bill on Tuesday.