Bills could help Missourians with disabilities advance their careers, get married

      Missourians living with disabilities could no longer have to reject raises and promotions, or even choose not to get married, in order to keep receiving needed state assistance, under legislation now awaiting the governor’s action.

Representative Melanie Stinnett (Photo: Tim Bommel, Missouri House Communications)

      Among legislation that was approved by the House and Senate last month was a provision to change the state’s Ticket to Work health insurance program within MO HealthNet.  It would increase the limit on how much a person can earn before they lose benefits under that program.  It would also not count up to $50,000 of a spouse’s income toward that limit.  

      Such state benefits provide to some Missourians with disabilities things like personal care attendants, medication, services, and equipment that allow them to have a job in the first place.  Those Missourians must sometimes reject raises or promotions because the changes in income would not offset the benefits they would lose. 

      Another provision would require state agencies to use an “employment first” policy, directing them to recruit and keep employees with disabilities and create competitive ways to integrate them into workforces.

      This legislation received broad, bipartisan support in both chambers.  In the House they were carried by Springfield Republican Melanie Stinnett.  She said legislators have been growing more aware of how state assistance programs designed to help Missourians are sometimes holding them back.

      “When we look at how this language in the current statute was impacting their ability to continue taking those raises or getting a new job in a new area, or in our communities we hear issues with workforce all the time and we’re wanting to do upskill training and we’re wanting to do all of these things to help people improve their skills and improve their earning potential but for individuals with disabilities we put a cap on that, and that is not what we want to be doing.  We want to allow individuals in our communities to work to their highest capacity and help them to thrive within their community.”

      “It’s something that’s been worked on for nearly 20 years and there are a lot of people that have worked on it year over year over year, and I’m really happy to be a part of the team to bring it across the finish line,” said Stinnett.

      Representative Bridget Walsh Moore (D-St. Louis) lives and works with a disability, and has long advocated for these changes.  She said these will yield, “immediate, tangible results that are going to benefit so many people.”

Representative Bridget Walsh Moore (Photo: Tim Bommel, Missouri House Communications)

      “We will have a different workforce by the end of this year.  This goes into effect in August.  By the end of the year … our workforce will look entirely different because these people can go after that promotion, apply for that new job, they can move up the ladder, now it’s worth it to go back to school and get that degree or my master’s because I’ll actually be able to get the job I want,” said Walsh Moore. 

      “This will have immediate results on the economy, immediate impact.  When you go from making 40-grand to 80 overnight you’re going to spend that money.  You’re either going to pay off debt, you’re going to get a  better place to live, you’re going to go out to eat more, you’re going to buy new clothes, whatever.  You’re going to spend that money.  When you’ve been told that you have to penny pinch for so long, that money’s going to end up immediately back in the economy, so it’s a double benefit to the state.  The state is only winning in this situation.”

      Stinnett is particularly excited about the provision to ease the limit on a spouse’s income, “So we’re not disincentivizing marriage for individuals with disabilities, which I think is really important.”

      About that provision Walsh Moore mentioned a childhood friend of hers who developed lupus. 

      “She is still living with her long-time boyfriend.  She couldn’t get married because she would lose her benefits because her boyfriend makes too much money but he can’t solely support her.  She could get married later this year.  That’s huge,” said Walsh Moore.  “You hear all the time of people divorcing so they can deal with medical issues – just divorcing on paper so that they can handle whatever disease has come into their life.  It’s awful.”

      Supporters of the employment first language said it was long overdue and would allow Missourians with disabilities to work to their fullest extent, which benefits the whole state.

      Stinnett said it is, “showing that Missouri really values individuals with disabilities in our workforce and wants them to have options for competitive, integrated employment within their communities.”

      Walsh Moore, who had advocated for this legislation since being elected in 2020 and said it has been proposed long before that, said, “It’s very exciting to finally see it done … it didn’t get a hearing every year but every year it did, no one has ever testified against it and no one has ever voted against it.”

      Governor Mike Parson (R) has until July 14 to act on Senate Bill 106 and Senate Bill 45, both of which contain these provisions. He could sign them into law or veto them, or let them become law without his action.  If they become law, the provisions would become effective on August 28.

Twelve year push gets increased penalties for ‘celebratory gunfire’ to governor’s desk for first time

      Nearly 12 years after the tragic death of an 11 year-old Independence girl, the Missouri legislature has voted for a bill bearing her name.  “Blair’s Law” would increase the penalty for recklessly firing guns into the air and, backers hope, raise awareness about how dangerous that practice is.

Blair Shanahan Lane (Photo courtesy: Michelle Shanahan DeMoss)

      The House had voted in two previous years to pass Blair’s law and this year the Senate concurred, sending it for the first time to the governor’s desk.  The proposal was added to Senate Bill 189, which was passed out of the House 109-11 and now awaits the action of Governor Mike Parson (R).

      It was news Michele Shanahan DeMoss, the mother of Blair Shanahan Lane, had been working toward and awaiting for more than a decade.

      “It started as overwhelming,” DeMoss told House Communications.  “Just really quietly thinking like, ‘wow, we’re not going to have to do this again.’”

      What DeMoss was realizing she might not have to do again is come to Jefferson City and testify before legislators as she has done multiple times each year since her daughter’s death, each time recounting and reliving the events of July 4, 2011.  That was when, while outside celebrating the holiday, Blair was truck in the neck by a bullet fired by someone more than half a mile away who had fired their gun into the air.  She died the next day.

      “[Testifying on Blair’s Law legislation] has become a pattern of living, and nothing, by any means, that I’m not going to be happy not having to do anymore,” said DeMoss, who quickly adds that a lot of good has come and continues to come out of that effort.  “I was reminded by somebody [in the Capitol] when I went to tell them goodbye and they said, ‘No, no, no, you can come back and visit us.  You don’t have to come back just because of that.  With that being said, just because it’s done doesn’t mean the good things that have happened because of what we’ve been doing for the past 12 years can’t remain.”

      Some of that good has come in the form of increased awareness. 

      “There’s no doubt our conversation and consistent work has definitely made a difference,” said DeMoss.

      Police believe firearms are still being discharged into the air, however, especially around holidays like New Year’s Eve.  The SoundSpotter system, sound capturing technology that the Kansas City Police Department uses to identify potential gunshots, identified more than 2,300 rounds fired between 6 p.m. December 31, 2022, and 6 a.m. the following morning.  That was more than double the total from the previous year.

      Representative Mark Sharp (D-Kansas City) said a desire to increase awareness that firing guns into the air is not safe was one of his biggest motivations for carrying Blair’s Law.

      “The governor signing it, different legislators in their respective districts and cities creating an awareness about it will help, the media will play a real big role in this,” said Sharp. 

      Sharp is optimistic that the governor will sign Blair’s Law into law, partly based on conversations he’s had with Parson’s staff. 

Michele Shanahan DeMoss (Photo: Michael Lear, Missouri House Communications)

      This was Sharp’s fourth year sponsoring the legislation, joining several other current and former legislators who have carried that proposal since 2011.  This year’s version would specify that a person is guilty of unlawful discharge of a firearm if they, with criminal negligence, discharge a firearm in or into the limits of a municipality.  A first offense would be a class “A” misdemeanor which carries up to a year in jail and a fine of up to $2,000; a second time would be a class “E” felony carrying up to four years in prison; and third and any subsequent offense would be a class “D” felony, punishable by up to seven years in prison.

      No state law directly addresses “celebratory gunfire.”  In Kansas City it is a violation of city ordinance.  The man who fired the bullet that killed Blair pleaded guilty to involuntary manslaughter and served 18 months in prison.  Had Blair’s Law been in effect, the above penalties could have been applied in addition to that sentence.

      Penalties are one thing, but as Sharp and DeMoss said, as much as anything, Blair’s Law has been about awareness.

      “Obviously we’ve done press conferences in the past and that’s on the local news too, but I think if it’s talked about on a more regular basis and not just once or twice a year we’ll start to see some more awareness with it,” said Sharp. 

      Blair’s Law has consistently had broad, bipartisan support, yet it still took 11 legislative sessions before it passed.  In spite of that, DeMoss didn’t get frustrated and didn’t give up.  She said in many of the past years when the bill didn’t pass, she wondered whether it was because of some oversight on her part, “[before] realizing it was a course of time and, as in a lot of things, it wasn’t for me to have control over.  As the years turned, the education and the understanding and the relationships are what were supposed to happen, and it continues happening.”

      Sharp said it is because DeMoss persevered that this legislation finally made it to the governor. 

      “She’s a joy.  She is a real joy,” said Sharp, who notes that he knows what it’s like to be around a parent who has lost a daughter, as his own sister died in a domestic violence incident when he was eight.

Representative Mark Sharp (Photo: Tim Bommel, Missouri House Communications)

       “The grace that Blair’s mom carries herself with is just first class, top notch, and she could easily be coming to Jefferson City angry that it hasn’t been passed yet.  She could easily have been that kind of person but she wasn’t.  I think that speaks to her character.”

      While waiting to see what Governor Parson will do, DeMoss is taking this latest, farthest progress as a victory. 

“The list is very long of thanking people for their support and thanking everybody for continually raising awareness.  I think people finally realize it is a tragedy that continues to happen,” she said.

The passage of a law bearing Blair’s name isn’t the only way she is being remembered.  Blair has also been honored for being an organ donor, with six of her organs having gone to five people, and DeMoss still runs a charity in her daughter’s name:  Blair’s Foster Socks gives socks and other items to children in need.

      “We continue to grow and restructure but definitely socks are still coming in and good things are still happening.  We just hosted a small group of boy scouts and look forward to distributing some socks.  Earlier in the year we had a group that we got together with and made sock puppets … and deliver them to some nursing homes.  The socks are just something simple that help us to empower, to uplift, and to give back.”

      DeMoss has found it difficult when asked to sum up how she feels with this bill passage, but she recalls a message someone else sent to her, “‘I really wanna say congratulations but the gravity of the reason this law is needed keeps me from celebrating, but we can now be thankful that Missouri now is a safer place to be for future celebrations.’”

      Governor Parson has until July 14 to either sign SB 189 into law, veto it, or allow it to become law without his signature.  If it becomes law, Blair’s Law would become effective August 28.

Extension of postpartum coverage for low-income mothers expected to save lives, awaits governor’s action

      One of the measures the Missouri legislature approved before its session ended last week could save and improve the lives of mothers and their infants, and get the state out of the basement in state rankings for infant and maternal mortality.

Representative Melanie Stinnett (Photo: Tim Bommel, Missouri House Communications)

      Amendments added to two bills, Senate Bill 106 and Senate Bill 45, would extend MO HealthNet or Show-Me Healthy Babies coverage for low-income pregnant women to a full year after the end of their pregnancy.  Currently that coverage stops after 60 days. 

      At the beginning of the legislative session a bipartisan group of six House members had filed that proposal, with several more having co-sponsored it. 

      “It takes a team of people that really care about legislation to move it and I’m just proud to be a part of that team,” said Representative Melanie Stinnett (R-Springfield), one of those sponsors. 

      “I think it makes a big difference for women who are looking at what life looks like after birth and how they can take care of themselves well and make sure that their family is healthy also.  It really is going to impact children, also.  I spoke when I testified in the House hearing about how important that first year of life is for a child, and if that mom’s getting healthcare she can ask those important questions about those things that are impacting her child, as well, so I think there are a wide variety of impacts that we’re going to see for families.”

      It was the fourth time Representative LaKeySha Bosley (D-St. Louis) had brought the idea forward, and she said she was ecstatic to see one of “her babies” reach the governor’s desk, and for it to have been part of a truly bipartisan effort.

Representative LaKeySha Bosley (Photo: Tim Bommel, Missouri House Communications)

      “Everybody was just excited about actually doing something around postpartum that could really make a difference,” said Bosley.

      Legislators heard time and time again that a reason to pass this legislation is that Missouri is one of the lowest ranked states in terms of maternal and infant mortality.  Representative Patty Lewis’ (D-Kansas City) background includes more than 20 years in nursing.  She said this extension will make a huge difference for low-income Missouri mothers, and thereby help Missouri improve that ranking.

      “Currently an average of 60 Missouri women die within one year of being pregnant … seventy-five percent of these deaths are preventable, so extending the coverage from 60 days to one year will absolutely address our maternal mortality rate in this state.”

      Many Republicans point out that the measure is also fiscally conservative.  By improving outcomes for mothers, and thereby for their infants, many of them will require less state assistance and will make fewer emergency room visits.

      Sedalia Republican Brad Pollitt said, “I didn’t vote for expanded Medicaid but this isn’t an expansion, this is just an extension for a select few who kind of fall through the cracks.  I was glad that we were able to give them the opportunity to have this coverage to cut down on the number of deaths, not only in the mothers but also the babies.”

Representative Patty Lewis (Photo: Tim Bommel, Missouri House Communications)

He adds, “I’m pleased that we had a bipartisan, pro-life bill that we could come to an agreement on and pass and get it to the governor’s desk.”

      Democrats say the bill was especially important in the wake of last year’s U.S. Supreme Court decision that triggered a law banning most abortions in Missouri. 

      “We need to give [women] access to the services and the care that they need in order to stay healthy in order to raise those babies,” said Bosley.

      She noted that some groups in Missouri are impacted more greatly by infant and maternal mortality than others. 

      “As an African American woman I am three times more likely to die during childbirth in the State of Missouri and throughout this country, so to be able to give women who look like me and poor women across this state an opportunity to be able to have lifesaving [healthcare], like we’re actually changing lives, that was the purpose of us being sent here.”

      Bosley said this additional coverage for mothers and infants impacts an entire family.  People often don’t think about what a partner goes through when a mother or infant are sick.

Brad Pollitt
(Photo: Tim Bommel, Missouri House Communications)

      “From a partner’s perspective, who doesn’t know how to identify the signs of when someone is going through a postpartum, maybe postpartum depression, this also gives them the ability to learn and to advocate on behalf of their partner – behalf of the mom and baby, so not only are we saving mommy and baby’s lives, we also are saving relationships and families and building a cohort around how we can do that for mommy, baby, and papa.”

      Each of these lawmakers spoke to House Communications through huge smiles as they talked about getting this legislation to the governor. 

      Said Lewis, “One of the main reasons I ran for office is because I believed I could save more lives on a macro level through policy, and this particular bill is something that will truly save lives.”

Pollitt added, “It’s a good thing.  It’s something we should do.  I think it’s a common sense approach.”

This provision would become law immediately upon SB 106 or SB 45 becoming law. Those bills are now awaiting action by Governor Mike Parson (R), who could choose to either sign them into law, allow them to become law without his action, or veto them.


Expansion of adoption tax credit sent to governor

      Missouri legislators hope one of the bills they’ve sent to the governor will lead to more children being adopted into loving homes. 

Representative Hannah Kelly (Photo: Tim Bommel, Missouri House Communications)

      One of the provisions in Senate Bill 24 would expand Missouri’s adoption tax credit, which offers a nonrefundable tax credit for one-time adoption-related expenses such as attorney fees, up to $10,000 per child.  That credit is capped at $6-million a year.  SB 24 would remove that cap, makes the tax credit refundable, and would have the per-child limit adjust with inflation.

      Those proposed changes are now awaiting action by Governor Mike Parson (R), and their House sponsor, Hannah Kelly (R-Mountain Grove), couldn’t be happier. 

      “I just think we did something really good today.  I honestly had given up on it and then it passed.  I couldn’t hardly believe it.  Now it’s on the governor’s desk.  I’m very thankful,” said Kelly.  “We’re just saying, ‘Hey, we’re here to make sure that we invest in these kids and these families, help them get across the line, get them out of the system, get them building their futures together as a family.’”

      More than 2,200 Missouri children are awaiting adoption.  Representative Keri Ingle (D-Lee’s Summit) once worked as an adoption specialist with the state Children’s Division, and said most of the families who would adopt those children see the system as complicated and laced with prohibitive expenses.

      “They know it costs a lot of money, they know it’s hard, they know that they have to jump through a lot of bureaucratic hurdles, but they don’t know that there’s support on the other end of it.  They don’t know that they’ll be eligible, perhaps, for a subsidy and tax credits and things like that, that will help them complete their family and get kids out of foster care and make it affordable and not cost prohibitive.”

      Ingle said this bill could make a huge difference.

“We have kids that linger in care indefinitely and unnecessarily, because there are so many families out there that want to adopt kids, that want to create forever homes for these kids, but they just feel like it’s beyond their fiscal ability to do so.  Anything we can do to help them through that process and create that forever family and get these kids out of [state] care … there are way too many people that would love to expand their families and adopt.”

      The bill is especially personal for Kelly, who talks often to her colleagues and in public settings about her own experience adopting her then-teenage daughter. 

      “My daughter is building her own life and celebrating her impending wedding coming soon and going to college and doing all the things that you hope to see your children do, not because of me but because she simply had the opportunity to know she had a forever home base to come back to.  To be a part of that is a privilege and to get to be a part of helping Missouri families provide that for children who otherwise would not have that, is a privilege.”

Representative Keri Ingle (Photo: Tim Bommel, Missouri House Communications)

      Ingle said even as other issues have caused tension between her party and Republicans there has been a lot of cooperation on issues like this one, and she’s been glad to be a part of it.

      “We’ve been really, really lucky to have a specific group of people in my tenure that have really placed children and child welfare at the forefront of what we work on and placed partisan ship at the very, very back when it comes to those things.  Politics has nothing to do with child welfare and it shouldn’t have anything to do with that.  We should all come together and do what’s right for the kids of this state, and so I’m always really proud to see the work that my colleagues do, on both sides of the aisle, when it pertains to that.”

      Kelly added, “If any Missouri family wants to give a child who does not have a forever home a home we need to back up and support them, and that is what this credit is about.”

      The House’s final vote on SB 24 was 139-5.  It now awaits the governor’s decision to either sign it into law, veto it, or allow it to become law without his action.

House votes unanimously for child sexual abuse victims to have more time to sue

      A measure to give victims of child sexual abuse more time to sue those responsible for their abuse was given a unanimous vote of support in the House last week.  The bill reached the floor too late to become law this year, but its sponsor hopes that vote will give it momentum for future sessions. 

Representative Brian Seitz (Photo: Tim Bommel, Missouri House Communications)

      In 2018 state law was changed to lift the statute of limitations on criminal prosecution of child sexual abuse, but in civil law a victim of childhood sexual abuse can only sue their abusers until they turn 31 or within three years of discovering that an injury or illness was the result of childhood sexual abuse, whichever occurs later.  House Bill 367 would have extended that age limit to 41, and expand the scope of who can be sued to include anyone who enabled abuse or allowed it to continue, or who created a circumstance in which it could occur.

“Through no fault of their own, children who have been abused in the past are being victimized again by not being allowed to hold their perpetrators to account in civil actions,” said the bill’s sponsor, Representative Brian Seitz (R-Branson)

      He said when the bill was heard by the House Judiciary Committee, people who experienced abuse as children in Missouri came from all over the state and as far away as Florida and Texas, to testify. 

“Many came from my own district to testify to the atrocities committed against them as children but it’s too late for them to face those involved in a civil action because the statute of limitations had run out before they came to terms with their abuse,” said Seitz.  “House Bill 376 cannot stop these past events but will allow for these children, now adults, to call the people – and I use that term loosely – to be held to account, and creates a path for civil actions to benefit the survivors and provide some form of restitution and accountability.”

Seitz refers to abuse that happened at Kanakuk Summer Camp at Branson, which in 2010 resulted in a former counselor there receiving two life sentences in Missouri prison.

      “I bring forward House Bill 367 to the House Floor for Evan; for Elizabeth, whose brother, Trey, committed suicide in 2019 because of the abuse; for Keith; for Jody; for Jessica; and for Ashton.”

      The House voted 150-0 for the bill’s perfection, or initial passage, which normally would be one step in the process toward it being sent to the Senate.  In this case, said Seitz, it is a symbolic vote and one he hopes will lead to this change in Missouri law eventually being made.

      One of the bill’s co-sponsors, Representative Raychel Proudie (D-Ferguson), called the bill, “incredible.  It is one of the proudest things I’ve been able to look at this year … this is probably the best bill we’re going to hear on this floor this year.  I ask the body’s unanimous support.”

      With this year’s session ending on Friday, Seitz plans to pre-file the language of HB 367 again for the 2024 legislative session.

Ban of invasive medical exams without consent sent to governor

      The legislature has voted to ensure that Missouri patients can no longer have invasive medical examinations performed while they’re unconscious and without prior knowledge or consent.

Representative Hannah Kelly (Photo: Tim Bommel, Missouri House Communications)

      Legislators were told that medical students and residents have been allowed and even directed to perform anal, prostate, or pelvic examinations on unconscious patients as part of their instruction, sometimes without those patients’ consent. 

      House Bill 402 contains several provisions regarding healthcare.  One of those would specify that such exams on unconscious patients may only be conducted when that patient or their authorized representative has given consent; the examination is necessary for medical purposes; or when such an exam is necessary to gather evidence of a sexual assault.  The legislature voted last week to send HB 402 to Governor Mike Parson (R) for his action.

      Representative Hannah Kelly (R-Mountain Grove) sponsored that provision.  She told House Communications, “The patient has the right to know what’s going on.”

      She said her first concern regarding that issue was for survivors of sexual assault, some of whom she knows personally.

      “If you talk to sexual assault survivors, often times they’re very hesitant, especially if they’re younger, to go seek healthcare and to have confidence to get the proper healthcare that they need.  This was brought to me out of the concern that we make it abundantly clear in statute that if you’re going to put somebody under anesthesia in regards to any kind of female exam that they have full disclosure of what’s happening before you go under,” said Kelly.  “I think anybody likes that, right?  But especially if you’re a sexual assault survivor that’s something that is of utmost importance to make sure that you’re getting what you need from your healthcare provider because you’re hesitant, because you’re not secure and you’re not feeling confident of the process.”

      The patient examination issue was an important one for legislators in both parties, and as a standalone bill, was voted out of the House 157-0.

      Representative Patty Lewis (D-Kansas City) was glad to see it achieve final passage this year.

Representative Patty Lewis (Photo: Tim Bommel, Missouri House Representatives)

      “I’m a nurse by background.  I worked in academic, teaching hospitals.  I worked with residents and med students all the time and when I first learned about this issue I was shocked.  I couldn’t believe that intimate examinations were happening to people without their consent.”

      Lewis noted that this passage shouldn’t hamper students’ abilities to learn.  She said they have other chances to receive instruction in such examinations.

      “If you go to one of the academic facilities you can opt in to have the med students or residents be part of your care team, or opt out if you don’t want to.”

      Any health care provider who violates the new section of law, or any supervisor of a student or trainee who violates it, would be subject to discipline by their licensing board.

      Kelly, meanwhile, encourages Missourians to ask questions of their healthcare providers and to makes sure they are made fully aware of what will happen if and when they are put under anesthesia.

      The House voted 120-31 to send HB 402 to Governor Parson, who can now sign it into law, veto it, or allow it to become law without his action. 

Legislature votes to incent film productions, touring musicians to come to Missouri

      With the third piece of statutory legislation to reach the governor this year the legislature tries to bring more entertainment industry projects and the dollars that come with them to Missouri.

Representative Kurtis Gregory (Photo: Tim Bommel, Missouri House Communications)

      House lawmakers have for years bemoaned the fact that major motion picture and television productions bypass the Show-Me State for states with better incentive packages – even productions that are set in Missouri

Senate Bill 94 would establish tax credits for film projects starting at 20-percent of specified costs, with opportunities for additional credits as other criteria are met.

      Dubbed the “Show MO Act,” House handler Kurtis Gregory (R-Marshall) said the program is well thought out.

      “Investments have to be made inside the state before the credits are handed out,” said Gregory.  “The Department of Economic Development will kind of have the final say in whether or not the credit goes out if it meets the program.”

      Improved film tax credits have been considered by Missouri legislators for years.  They often noted that when the 2014 movie Gone Girl was filmed in Missouri it brought $7.8-million to the state while hiring more than 110 Missourians and more than one thousand more appeared as extras. 

      More often, however, other states have won out on productions of stories that take place in Missouri because they have better incentive packages.  The Netflix series Ozark, even though it unfolded around the Lake of the Ozarks, was filmed in Georgia.  Even scenes taking place in the Missouri Capitol were filmed in Georgia’s capitol.

      Gregory told colleagues, “When film producers call the State of Missouri, call the state film office to say ‘We want to film this movie here,’ and they ask the next question, ‘What’s the incentive program in Missouri look like?” and when our film office has to then say, ‘We’ve got really great locations,’ because they can’t answer the question on whether or not there’s incentives in Missouri, there’s great business leaving this state.”

      SB 94 would allow film productions additional credits when at least half of filming is done in Missouri; at least 15-percent takes place in rural or blighted areas; at least three of a project’s departments hire a Missourian ready to advance in their field; or the project positively portrays the state or something in it.

      The bill also aims to bring more music industry dollars to the state by authorizing credits for rehearsal and tour expenses for live tours and associated rehearsals. 

Representative Steve Butz (Photo: Tim Bommel, Missouri House Communications)

      Legislators laid out limits for these credits as well, as Gregory explained.  “There must be at least $1-million spent with Missouri music vendors, they’ve got to rehearse in a qualified facility for a minimum of ten days, they also have to then do two concerts within the State of Missouri.”

      Those credits would be for 30-percent of tour or rehearsal expenses, capped at $1-million if expenses are less than $4-million.  No taxpayer could get a credit greater than $2-million for expenses between $4- and $8-million; nor greater than $3-million for expenses exceeding $8-million.  Combined credits are limited to $8-million per fiscal year.

      The film tax incentives would expire at the end of 2029 unless the legislature votes to extend them.  The tour and rehearsal credits would expire at the end of 2030 unless extended.

      The bill has broad bipartisan support, with lawmakers in both parties wanting to bring more entertainment industry proceeds to Missouri.  Representative Steve Butz (D-St. Louis) said as has happened with other businesses, the tax credits might get this industry to come to Missouri only to later stay and stand on its own.

      “Here’s another example where we take some help from government to prime that pump, got people willing to do business here,” said Butz.

      “Both of these bills are well-needed.  It’s going to drive industry and economic development to the state,” said Gregory.

      The House voted 113-45 to send that legislation to Governor Mike Parson (R) for his consideration. 

Help for low-income and disabled Missourians a focus in final days of session

      In the House, proposals that would help Missourians with disabilities, those with low incomes, and new mothers on state assistance, are being given every chance to become law before the end of the session next week.  The chamber has voted to add those pieces of legislation to several bills that are still in play in these final days.

Representative Melanie Stinnett (Photo: Tim Bommel, Missouri House Communications)

      Among those is a transitional program meant to help people get off of state assistance gradually as their income increases.  House members say the state’s assistance programs for low-income Missourians trap people in poverty because if they accept a raise that puts them above a program’s limits, they could lose more in state benefits than they gain from a raise. 

      The measure, sponsored by Representative Alex Riley (R-Springfield), would let people incrementally transition off of state assistance, “Trying to create this transitional system that encouraged people to work, that encouraged people to take those raises and to start to work their way up the income ladder and to hopefully, once this goes into effect, actually reduce the number of people receiving benefits in the state.”

      That provision is the product of years of work by members of both parties.  Lee’s Summit Democrat Keri Ingle called it a, “great bill … it’s been a bipartisan effort to essentially wean folks off of assistance, whether it’s TANF or SNAP, and make it easier for Missourians to get what they need to be successful working citizens while at the same time making sure that all of their needs are being met.”

Representative Bridget Walsh Moore (Photo: Tim Bommel, Missouri House Communications)

      The House has voted this week to add that language to two bills.  It did the same for language sponsored by Representative Melanie Stinnett (R-Springfield) that could allow individuals with disabilities to finally be able to advance in their careers without worry of losing state assistance. 

      The changes to the state’s Ticket to Work health insurance program within MO HealthNet would increase the limit to how much a person can earn before they lose benefits, and would not count up to $50,000 of a spouse’s income toward that limit.  It would also direct state agencies to have policies to recruit and keep employees with disabilities and create competitive ways to integrate them into workforces.

      “These are people who are actually begging us to work, who want to work, who want to get promotions, who want to seek new jobs.  What [this] bill does is address the fiscal cliff, making sure that you don’t have to do quite as much of a tap dance that too many people in our state are doing, where you’re allowed to make so much money but only to a certain point,” said St. Louis Democrat Bridget Walsh Moore.

      Walsh Moore, who lives and works with a disability, said the benefits that individuals stand to lose often enable them to have a job in the first place.  Things like, “a personal care attendant, your health insurance your additional services and equipment that you receive through the state that allow you to work.  This would address and allow you to make more money, put that money back into the economy because if you make more money you’re going to spend more money.”

Representative Alex Riley (Photo: Tim Bommel, Missouri House Communications)

      Also supported in the House this week has been a bipartisan plan to extend post-partum coverage under MO HealthNet or Show-Me Healthy Babies from 60 days to a year.

      Stinnett, one of several sponsors of this proposal, said, “In 2019, 75-percent of pregnancy-related deaths in Missouri were determined to be preventable; those deaths that were attributed to things like embolism, hemorrhage, infections, concerns with cardiovascular health, chronic health conditions, and there’s one common denominator that can save these women’s lives, and that’s healthcare access.”

      Several Republicans have cited this as an important pro-life provision.  Representative Darin Chappell (R-Rogersville) said, “We who talk about being pro-life, I don’t know how we do that and then cut off the most vulnerable of our society after 60 days … I believe if we’re ever going to spend money [on benefits programs] it ought to be for those most vulnerable among us.  Those very ones that we fought for them to be able to be born.  We have to take care of them.”

      Representative Tony Lovasco (R-O’Fallon) said even very conservative Republicans like himself could get behind all of these proposals, which don’t expand the state’s assistance programs.

Representative Keri Ingle (Photo: Tim Bommel, Missouri House Communications

 “The reality is we are in a situation where we all, in all of our districts, have employers that are begging for workers.  The number of unfilled positions right now is just astronomical and the idea that we as a state might incentivize people to stay home and not work and not take a promotion, not take a job opportunity because they might just make a slim little bit more money that puts them in a hole when it comes to feeding their family, well that’s just insane.”      

Sponsors are hopeful at least one of the bills containing these provisions will reach the governor’s desk before the session closes at 6pm on May 12.