Missouri House Republicans and Democrats wrapped up the penultimate week of the session by speaking to reporters and fielding questions, especially about passing the Fiscal Year 2024 budget:
Legislature votes to incent film productions, touring musicians to come to Missouri
With the third piece of statutory legislation to reach the governor this year the legislature tries to bring more entertainment industry projects and the dollars that come with them to Missouri.
House lawmakers have for years bemoaned the fact that major motion picture and television productions bypass the Show-Me State for states with better incentive packages – even productions that are set in Missouri.
Senate Bill 94 would establish tax credits for film projects starting at 20-percent of specified costs, with opportunities for additional credits as other criteria are met.
Dubbed the “Show MO Act,” House handler Kurtis Gregory (R-Marshall) said the program is well thought out.
“Investments have to be made inside the state before the credits are handed out,” said Gregory. “The Department of Economic Development will kind of have the final say in whether or not the credit goes out if it meets the program.”
Improved film tax credits have been considered by Missouri legislators for years. They often noted that when the 2014 movie Gone Girl was filmed in Missouri it brought $7.8-million to the state while hiring more than 110 Missourians and more than one thousand more appeared as extras.
More often, however, other states have won out on productions of stories that take place in Missouri because they have better incentive packages. The Netflix series Ozark, even though it unfolded around the Lake of the Ozarks, was filmed in Georgia. Even scenes taking place in the Missouri Capitol were filmed in Georgia’s capitol.
SB 94 would allow film productions additional credits when at least half of filming is done in Missouri; at least 15-percent takes place in rural or blighted areas; at least three of a project’s departments hire a Missourian ready to advance in their field; or the project positively portrays the state or something in it.
The bill also aims to bring more music industry dollars to the state by authorizing credits for rehearsal and tour expenses for live tours and associated rehearsals.
Legislators laid out limits for these credits as well, as Gregory explained. “There must be at least $1-million spent with Missouri music vendors, they’ve got to rehearse in a qualified facility for a minimum of ten days, they also have to then do two concerts within the State of Missouri.”
Those credits would be for 30-percent of tour or rehearsal expenses, capped at $1-million if expenses are less than $4-million. No taxpayer could get a credit greater than $2-million for expenses between $4- and $8-million; nor greater than $3-million for expenses exceeding $8-million. Combined credits are limited to $8-million per fiscal year.
The film tax incentives would expire at the end of 2029 unless the legislature votes to extend them. The tour and rehearsal credits would expire at the end of 2030 unless extended.
The bill has broad bipartisan support, with lawmakers in both parties wanting to bring more entertainment industry proceeds to Missouri. Representative Steve Butz (D-St. Louis) said as has happened with other businesses, the tax credits might get this industry to come to Missouri only to later stay and stand on its own.
“Both of these bills are well-needed. It’s going to drive industry and economic development to the state,” said Gregory.
The House voted 113-45 to send that legislation to Governor Mike Parson (R) for his consideration.
Help for low-income and disabled Missourians a focus in final days of session
In the House, proposals that would help Missourians with disabilities, those with low incomes, and new mothers on state assistance, are being given every chance to become law before the end of the session next week. The chamber has voted to add those pieces of legislation to several bills that are still in play in these final days.
Among those is a transitional program meant to help people get off of state assistance gradually as their income increases. House members say the state’s assistance programs for low-income Missourians trap people in poverty because if they accept a raise that puts them above a program’s limits, they could lose more in state benefits than they gain from a raise.
The measure, sponsored by Representative Alex Riley (R-Springfield), would let people incrementally transition off of state assistance, “Trying to create this transitional system that encouraged people to work, that encouraged people to take those raises and to start to work their way up the income ladder and to hopefully, once this goes into effect, actually reduce the number of people receiving benefits in the state.”
That provision is the product of years of work by members of both parties. Lee’s Summit Democrat Keri Ingle called it a, “great bill … it’s been a bipartisan effort to essentially wean folks off of assistance, whether it’s TANF or SNAP, and make it easier for Missourians to get what they need to be successful working citizens while at the same time making sure that all of their needs are being met.”
The House has voted this week to add that language to two bills. It did the same for language sponsored by Representative Melanie Stinnett (R-Springfield) that could allow individuals with disabilities to finally be able to advance in their careers without worry of losing state assistance.
The changes to the state’s Ticket to Work health insurance program within MO HealthNet would increase the limit to how much a person can earn before they lose benefits, and would not count up to $50,000 of a spouse’s income toward that limit. It would also direct state agencies to have policies to recruit and keep employees with disabilities and create competitive ways to integrate them into workforces.
“These are people who are actually begging us to work, who want to work, who want to get promotions, who want to seek new jobs. What [this] bill does is address the fiscal cliff, making sure that you don’t have to do quite as much of a tap dance that too many people in our state are doing, where you’re allowed to make so much money but only to a certain point,” said St. Louis Democrat Bridget Walsh Moore.
Walsh Moore, who lives and works with a disability, said the benefits that individuals stand to lose often enable them to have a job in the first place. Things like, “a personal care attendant, your health insurance your additional services and equipment that you receive through the state that allow you to work. This would address and allow you to make more money, put that money back into the economy because if you make more money you’re going to spend more money.”
Also supported in the House this week has been a bipartisan plan to extend post-partum coverage under MO HealthNet or Show-Me Healthy Babies from 60 days to a year.
Stinnett, one of several sponsors of this proposal, said, “In 2019, 75-percent of pregnancy-related deaths in Missouri were determined to be preventable; those deaths that were attributed to things like embolism, hemorrhage, infections, concerns with cardiovascular health, chronic health conditions, and there’s one common denominator that can save these women’s lives, and that’s healthcare access.”
Several Republicans have cited this as an important pro-life provision. Representative Darin Chappell (R-Rogersville) said, “We who talk about being pro-life, I don’t know how we do that and then cut off the most vulnerable of our society after 60 days … I believe if we’re ever going to spend money [on benefits programs] it ought to be for those most vulnerable among us. Those very ones that we fought for them to be able to be born. We have to take care of them.”
Representative Tony Lovasco (R-O’Fallon) said even very conservative Republicans like himself could get behind all of these proposals, which don’t expand the state’s assistance programs.
Sponsors are hopeful at least one of the bills containing these provisions will reach the governor’s desk before the session closes at 6pm on May 12.
Physical therapists to no longer require referrals after Governor signs new law
The first legislation signed into law out of this session will get Missourians in front of the caregivers they need more quickly and with less cost.
Governor Mike Parson (R) on Thursday signed Senate Bill 51, sponsored by Senator Karla Eslinger (R-Wasola), which will allow people to go to physical therapists without having to first visit another doctor and get a referral.
“Currently, patients must visit a physician before they can make an appointment with a physical therapist. This costs the patient additional money and delays in returning to their life before the injury,” said Representative Brenda Shields (R-St. Joseph), who handled the bill in the House. “It is time for Missourians to choose their own healthcare path and get their lives back.”
Shields has spoken passionately about this proposal largely because of the role physical therapists have played in her own life.
Shields said no matter what she does from here on, she expects the passage of this language will stand as a highlight of her political career.
Shields announced to her colleagues in the chamber on Thursday morning that the bill would be signed, and her physical therapist Dr. Ben Perkins was her guest in the chamber then and at the bill signing.
Representative Deb Lavender (D-Manchester) is a physical therapist. She said it’s frustrating to have to turn away people who come to her, knowing she could ease their pain.
The proposal has been around for years in the legislature, with Governor Parson saying he handled it early in his legislative career which began in 2005.
“I couldn’t be more pleased signing this, being the first bill that we’re really going to sign,” said Parson. “I think one thing we learned is how important healthcare is no matter where you live in the State of Missouri, and how many opportunities people have to get it. By doing this bill we’re going to expand that to many more people and cut a lot of bureaucracy out of the way simply to care for people, and I think that’s what we all wanted to do.”
Under the bill, a physical therapist can refer a patient to another health care provider if they exhibit certain conditions which the physical therapist is unable to treat, or if the patient’s condition doesn’t improve within 30 days or ten visits.
The House voted on April 12 to pass SB 51, 146-2. With its signing, Missouri joins 47 other states who already allowed people to go to physical therapists without first getting a referral. The bill’s provisions take effect August 28.
VIDEOS: Republicans’ and Democrats’ end of the week media conferences
Missouri House Republicans and Democrats spoke to the media and fielded questions before legislators went home for the weekend:
Dispatchers ask for help dealing with PTSD, seek ‘first responder’ designation
The state’s 911 dispatchers are urging lawmakers to add them to the state’s legal definition of “first responders,” before the legislative session ends. Some of them visited the Capitol to share personal stories illustrating why they need the help in dealing with post-traumatic stress that comes with that designation.
First responders – which state statute currently defines as firefighters, law enforcement personnel, and emergency medical personnel – are afforded mental health resources, and several legislators say those should also be available to dispatchers.
Representative Lane Roberts (R-Joplin) has been Joplin’s Police Chief and the state’s Director of Public Safety, among other things in his career of more than 40 years. Throughout all of that time he worked with dispatchers and even worked as one at times.
“We have always underappreciated these folks. They’re kind of out of sight, out of mind. They work in a windowless environment, but they are the first of the first responders. They’re the gateway to public safety,” said Roberts. “Every time they get an emergency call they get an adrenaline dump just like people who work in the field do. The difference is, the people in the field get to go somewhere, take action, use those chemicals, while the dispatcher will simply move on to the next call, take those chemicals home at night and go to sleep with them and suffer the health consequences.”
Independence representative Robert Sauls (D) was a prosecutor in Jackson County and a public defender.
“As a former prosecutor I would regularly listen to 911 calls and what happens in those circumstances and … often times people are contacting 911 operators on their worst day. Something’s happening, they’re scared, it’s a very stressful situation, and all of these 911 operators are under these stressful environments and the thing of it is, you’ve got to go on to the next one. You’ve gotten your one situation settled, you hang up the phone, and you’ve got another one. I think it’s very important to recognize these people as first responders.”
Polk County 911 Director Sarah Newell said what she and her colleagues do is often dismissed as just answering phones or clerical work.
J.R. Webb, the Assistant Director of Springfield/Green County 911, said dispatchers, “have to be able to do a lot of things at once. They have to be able to take that phone call, at the same time they’re typing that information into a computer, at the same time that they may be dealing with first responders on the radio. The multitasking is incredible in a busy situation, and it takes a special kind of person to be able to do that. It takes a kind of type ‘A,’ take charge personality to succeed at our job and it’s not meant for everybody.”
The Chair of the State 911 Board of Governance, Alan Wells, said “Post-traumatic stress is a big, big thing for our 911 telecommunicators, and as of right now they do not have a lot of resources there to help with that.”
He said it’s not uncommon for dispatchers, especially in the smaller communities throughout Missouri, to know personally the people involved in the incidents they are handling.
“Sometimes it can be very horrifying for those operators,” said Wells. “It may be a loved one, a family member, an immediate family member, or in our case it was one of our own 911 call takers who had just left his shift, headed home on his motorcycle and hit a deer and it was a fatality. The same operators that were just working with him had to take that call and work that incident.”
Hailey Brunner is in her fourth year as a dispatcher at the Cass Co Sheriff’s Office. She remembered one week in which her rotation, “worked seven fatalities, whether it be between an accident, people harming themselves, anything of that nature, natural deaths, anything, and it’s just a wide variety, whether it’s young kids to old kids. My most recent one was a two year-old who died in a fatality car accident.”
Blake Johnson has been dispatching for five years in Green County. He said there is one call he’ll always remember.
Brunner said dispatchers can’t help but imagine the scenes that they are hearing play out over the phone, and that can result in very vivid and very upsetting imagery.
Webb said worse still, dispatchers often get no closure at the end of a call.
He said an increasing number of suicides in Missouri also directly impacts dispatchers.
Some call centers, like that at Springfield, have mental health resources that are made available to dispatchers there and in surrounding communities. Such resources aren’t available to all dispatchers in Missouri, though, especially in many smaller communities.
Several bills would address PTSD and mental health resources for dispatchers and other first responders. These dispatchers and lawmakers are among those who hope at least one of those bills is passed before the session’s end on May 12.
VIDEOS: Republicans’ and Democrats’ end of the week media conferences
Missouri House Republicans and Democrats spoke to the media and fielded questions before legislators went home for the weekend:
VIDEO: House Republican and Democrat press conferences 04-13-2023
Missouri House Republicans and Democrats spoke to the media and fielded questions before legislators went home for the weekend:
As swatting incidents spike House weighs tougher penalties
False reports of school shootings and other crimes have been rampant for months throughout the United States, and the state House is considering a bill to deal with such crimes.
The practice is commonly called “swatting:” making a false report of a crime so that law enforcement – particularly a SWAT team – will respond to an address. It is often used as a revenge tactic, as a way to cause unrest, or in the minds of some it is even seen as a joke.
It isn’t funny to Representative Lane Roberts (R-Joplin), who has a lengthy career that includes time as Joplin’s Police Chief and Director of the Missouri Department of Public Safety. He said such reports create needless danger for the public and for law enforcement.
“Frequently people will make a false call for the purpose of harassing someone, discriminating against someone. It affects their reputation, their business, there’s a lot of consequences to some of these false reports and some of it’s pretty darn malicious,” said Roberts. “The difficulty is that the penalties for doing that now are pretty mild compared to the potential for injury that goes with a call like that. It’s just not something that we can put up with.”
For several years he has proposed legislation to address swatting. This week his latest such effort was heard by the House Committee on Public Safety, which he chairs.
He stressed to the committee that the key to House Bill 302 is how it would define the crime. That is, to give a false report to law enforcement, a security officer, a fire department, or other such organization, “with reckless disregard of causing bodily harm to any person as a direct result of an emergency response.”
Roberts explained, “This specifically says the person who makes the false report for the purpose of doing any of the enumerated things … we’re talking about, what’s the intent of the call?”
Under HB 302 those who make false reports that result in a person being killed or seriously hurt could be charged with a class-B felony, punishable by 5 to 15 years in prison. Falsely reporting a felony crime would be a class-E felony (up to four years in prison). Any other false reports would be a class-B misdemeanor (up to six months in jail and a fine of up to $1,000).
Juveniles making false reports for the first time would be guilty of a status offense. Any further offenses would be class-C misdemeanors and would require a juvenile court appearance or community service and a fine.
The bill would hold any person convicted under its provisions liable for the costs of any emergency response caused by their false report. They could also be sued by any victims. Roberts said that is because swatting can cause, “damage to someone’s business, their reputation, their ability to make a living, their livelihood, so if someone engages in that kind of conduct for the purpose of causing harm to someone’s livelihood, then by all means they should be accountable.”
Jordan Kadosh with the Anti-Defamation League spoke in favor of HB 302. He reiterated that instances of swatting have been spiking, especially after many of the recent shootings at schools throughout the nation. He said after the recent shooting that killed six people at The Covenant School in Nashville, Tennessee, Missouri law enforcement was “inundated with false reports.”
He said the bill is narrowly crafted to help prosecutors make cases against swatters and at last create real penalties for maliciously making false reports.
The committee has not voted on HB 302. Last year the House passed similar legislation 142-0, but it did advance out of the Senate.
Pronunciations:
Kadosh = kah-DOEsh
VIDEO: House Democrats end of week press conference
Missouri House Democrats spoke to the media and fielded questions before legislators went home for the weekend: